MarBEF Data System



ERMS taxon details

Ophioderma Müller & Troschel, 1840

marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent + fossil
neuter
Müller, J. & Troschel, F.H. (1840). Über die Gattungen der Ophiuren. <em>Archiv für Naturgeschichte.</em> 6(1): 326-330., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/7203204#page/335/mode/1up [details]   
Nomenclature The gender of this genus has long been confused. Early authors treated it as neuter or feminine (e.g. Tommasi 1970), ,...  
Nomenclature The gender of this genus has long been confused. Early authors treated it as neuter or feminine (e.g. Tommasi 1970), , without consensus. It was ruled to be of feminine gender by the ICZN (opinion 1152; 1980), but shortly after they issued a corrigendum, finally settling on neuter gender (IZCN 1981). [details]
Stöhr, S.; O’Hara, T.; Thuy, B. (Eds) (2020). World Ophiuroidea Database. Ophioderma Müller & Troschel, 1840. Accessed through: Costello, M.J.; Bouchet, P.; Boxshall, G.; Arvanitidis, C.; Appeltans, W. (2020) European Register of Marine Species at: http://www.marbef.org/data/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=123547 on 2020-02-28
Costello, M.J.; Bouchet, P.; Boxshall, G.; Arvanitidis, C.; Appeltans, W. (2020). European Register of Marine Species. Ophioderma Müller & Troschel, 1840. Accessed at: http://www.marbef.org/data/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=123547 on 2020-02-28
Date
action
by
2004-12-21 15:54:05Z
created
2007-07-12 13:29:01Z
checked
2008-07-11 07:30:24Z
changed
2008-10-15 08:22:19Z
changed
2009-04-01 08:13:38Z
changed
2010-10-28 08:53:52Z
changed
2016-07-11 14:01:29Z
changed
2018-03-22 14:58:20Z
changed
2018-09-18 15:00:22Z
changed
2020-02-14 09:22:38Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Müller, J. & Troschel, F.H. (1840). Über die Gattungen der Ophiuren. <em>Archiv für Naturgeschichte.</em> 6(1): 326-330., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/7203204#page/335/mode/1up [details]   

taxonomy source International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. (1981). Corrigenda. <em>Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature.</em> 38(4): 317., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/12227872
page(s): 317; note: Decision that Ophioderma is neuter. [details]   

taxonomy source Stöhr, S.; Weber, A. A.-T.; Boissin, E.; Chenuil, A. (2020). Resolving the Ophioderma longicauda (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) cryptic species complex: five sisters, three of them new – Corrigendum. <em>European Journal of Taxonomy.</em> (607)., available online at https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.607
note: Correction of gender of Ophioderma [details]   

taxonomy source Melville, R. V. (1980). Opinion 1152. Ophiura Lamarck, 1801 and Ophioderma Müller & Troschel, 1840 (Ophiuroidea): ruling on application of these names. <em>Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature.</em> 37(2): 78-80.
note: Erroneously made Ophioderma feminine. [details]   

taxonomy source Stöhr, S.; Boissin, E.; Chenuil, A. (2009). Potential cryptic speciation in Mediterranean populations of Ophioderma (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea). <em>Zootaxa.</em> 2071: 1-20. [details]   

basis of record Hansson, H.G. (2001). Echinodermata, <B><I>in</I></B>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). <i>European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels,</i>. 50: pp. 336-351. (look up in RoR[details]   

additional source Ljungman, A. (1867). Ophiuroidea viventia huc usque cognita enumerat. <em>Öfversigt af Kgl. Vetenskaps-Akademiens Förhandlingar 1866.</em> 23(9): 303-336., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/32287761 [details]   

additional source Koehler, R. (1914). A contribution to the study of Ophiurans of the United States National Museum. Bulletin of the United States National Museum 84: 1-173, available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/7907416
page(s): 3-8; note: Used Ophioderma as feminine and changed all names accordingly [details]   

additional source Müller, J. and Troschel, F. H. (1842). System der Asteriden.1. Asteriae. 2. Ophiuridae. <em>Vieweg: Braunschweig.</em> xxx+134 pp. 12 pls., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/44159
note: Presented longicauda as feminine, thereby confusing the true gender of Ophioderma [details]  OpenAccess publication 

additional source Lütken, C. F. (1859). Additamenta ad historiam Ophiuridarum. Anden Afdelning. <em>Det kongelige danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Skrifter. 5 Raekke, Naturvidenskabelig og mathematisk Afdelning.</em> 5, 177-271, 5 pl.
page(s): 187-200; note: Considered Ophioderma to be feminine [details]   

additional source Ziesenhenne, F.C. 1955. A review of the genus Ophioderma M. & T. Essays in the natural sciences in honour of Captain Alan Hancock, 185-201.
note: Considered Ophioderma to be neuter [details]   
 
 Present  Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
From editor or global species database
Nomenclature The gender of this genus has long been confused. Early authors treated it as neuter or feminine (e.g. Tommasi 1970), , without consensus. It was ruled to be of feminine gender by the ICZN (opinion 1152; 1980), but shortly after they issued a corrigendum, finally settling on neuter gender (IZCN 1981). [details]
 



To Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History (YPM IZ 077065)
To Yale Peabody Mus...
[hosted externally]

Web site hosted and maintained by Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ) - Contact
page generated: 2020-02-28 18:23:52 GMT+1