Marine Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning
EU Network of Excellence

 
Main Menu

· Home
· Contacts
· Data System
· Documents
· Events Calendar
· FAQ
· Forums
· Job M@RKET
· Links
· MarBEF Open Archive
· Network Description
· Outreach
· Photo Gallery
· Quality Assurance
· Register of Resources
· Research Projects
· Rules and Guidelines
· Training
· Weekly News Bulletin
· Wiki
· Worldconference
 

 

Last 3 Job opportunities View latest job opportunities RSS feed


>> Go to Job M@RKET

Last 2 forum posts View MarBEF Forum RSS feed

 Field course on sharks in South Africa (June 2011)
 training opportunity in basic taxonomy

>> Go to forums

 

 
Who's Online

Currently 20 guest(s) online
Currently 0 member(s) online
 

 
Login

Username

Password

 

MarBEF Open Archive (MOA)

MarBEF OA logo
Introduction | Search

report an error in this recordbasket (0): add | show Printer-friendly version

Large scale comparisons and databases MarBEF: lessons learned from data integration
Vanden Berghe, E. (2006). Large scale comparisons and databases MarBEF: lessons learned from data integration, in: (2006). Marine Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning EU Network of Excellence: General Assembly - Science Meeting Lecce (Italy) 9-11 May 2006: Book of Abstracts. pp. 3
In: (2006). Marine Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning EU Network of Excellence: General Assembly - Science Meeting Lecce (Italy) 9-11 May 2006: Book of Abstracts. University of Lecce: Italy. 22 pp., more

Available in Author 
    Vlaams Instituut voor de Zee: Open Repository 100971 [ download pdf ]
Document types: Conference paper; Summary

Keyword
    Marine

Author  Top 
  • Vanden Berghe, E.

Abstract
    Integration is the key issue in the MarBEF network. One of the important integrating activities is the development of databases, containing data and information on taxonomy and biogeography from a large number of partners. One of the datasets under development focuses on soft-bottom macrobenthos. A total of over 450,000 distribution records, from 42 different sources, were brought together in a single access database. Integrating data from different sources brought to light several issues. Lack of proper data management procedures with several of the partners made integrating those data a labour-intensive exercise. Lack of standards in sampling methodology made strict comparison differences in interpretation of taxonomy, differences in identifications, and numerous spelling variations would, if not corrected for, have lead to a serious overestimation of marine biodiversity.

 Top | Author