 |
 |
MarBEF Data System |
 |
|
|
|
WoRMS name details
original description
Daudin, François Marie. (1800). Receuil de mémoires et de notes sur des espèces inédites ou peu connues de Mollusques, de vers et de zoophytes. xviii & 19-50. Fuchs & Treuttel et Wurtz. Paris., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/96153
page(s): 49 [details]
additional source
Mörch, O. A. L. (1861). Review of the Vermetidae (Part I). <em>Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London.</em> 1861: 145-181, pl. 25 [September]., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/28672669 [details]
additional source
Bieler, R. & Petit, R. E. (2011). Catalogue of Recent and fossil “worm-snail” taxa of the families Vermetidae, Siliquariidae, and Turritellidae (Mollusca: Caenogastropoda). <em>Zootaxa.</em> 2948: 1-103., available online at http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2011/f/zt02948p103.pdf [details] Available for editors  [request]
status source
ICZN. (1987). Opinion 1425. Suppressed: <i>Spiroglyphus</i> Daudin, 1800 and <i>Stoa</i> De Serres, Mollusca, Gastropoda) and specific names published in combination with them. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature. 44(1): 57-58., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/12229416 [details]
status source
Keen, A Myra; Hadfield, Michael G. (1985). Spiroglyphus Daudin, 1800 and Stoa De Serres, 1855 (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Vermetidae): proposed suppression of two equivocal generic names. Z.N.(S.)2340. <em>Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature.</em> 42(1): 46-49., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/12228943 [details] Available for editors [request]
status source
Keen M. (1961). A proposed reclassification of the gastropod family Vermetidae. <i>Bulletin of the British Museum, Natural History (Zoology)</i>, 7(3): 183-213, pls. 54-55. [February], available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/27756384
page(s): 190, 191 [details]
From editor or global species database
Editor's comment Spiroglyphus Daudin is also duplicated as a record in the Molluscan section of WoRMS database. [details]
Nomenclature Spiroglyphus, believed by Daudin to be an annelid genus, is a rejected name under ICZN Opinion 1425, along with its two original species, as its phylum (whether mollusc or annelid) is indeterminable and if treated as a mollusc it could be senior to, and disruptive of, Dendropoma, a defined stable genus usage. [details]
|
|
|
|
|
