|
|
MarBEF Data System |
|
|
|
|
ERMS taxon details
original description
Sars, M. (1861). Uddrag af en Beskrivelse over Chaetopterus sarsii n.sp., og Chaetopterus norvegicus Sars. <em>Forhandlinger fra Videnskabs-Selskabet i Christiania.</em> 1860 year: 85-88., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/60473655 [details]
additional source
Böck, Christian. (1859). [Meeting report, 11 November] Hr. C. Boeck meddeelte Bemcerkninger over og Afbildning af en ny Art af Annelideslagten Chaetopterus, som han har bencevnet Chaetopterus Sarsii. [Hr C. Boeck communicated remarks on and Illustration of a new species of the annelid genus Chaetopterus, which he has named Chaetopterus sarsii.]. <em>Forhandlinger i Videnskabs-selskabet i Christiania.</em> 252., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/60474184 [details]
additional source
Bellan, G. (2001). Polychaeta, <i>in</i>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. <em>Collection Patrimoines Naturels.</em> 50: 214-231. (look up in RoR) note: checklist listing [details]
source of synonymy
Fauvel, P. (1927). Polychètes sédentaires. Addenda aux errantes, Arachiannélides, Myzostomaires. <em>Faune de France Volume 16. Paul Lechevalier. Paris.</em> 1-494., available online at http://www.faunedefrance.org/bibliotheque/docs/P.FAUVEL(FdeFr16)Polychetes-sendentaires.pdf page(s): 78; note: Fauvel only recognized Chaetopterus variopedatus worldwide [details]
status source
Moore, Jenna M.; Nishi, Eijiroh; Rouse, Greg W. (2017). Phylogenetic analyses of Chaetopteridae (Annelida). <em>Zoologica Scripta.</em> 46(5): 596-610., available online at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/zsc.12238/abstract note: Treated as valid. Authors (p.9) state: "Inclusion of five previously synonymized taxa in genetic analyses showed that C. antarcticus, C. sarsii and C. cf. brevis are genetically and morphologically di... Treated as valid. Authors (p.9) state: "Inclusion of five previously synonymized taxa in genetic analyses showed that C. antarcticus, C. sarsii and C. cf. brevis are genetically and morphologically distinct from C. variopedatus." [details]
|
|
|
|
|